Melbourne Office - PO Box 452, COLLINS STREET WEST VIC 8007 AUSTRALIA
Sydney Office - GPO Box 2506, SYDNEY NSW 2001 AUSTRALIA
Telephone: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3709 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 2600
Facsimile: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3217 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 3044
Email:adr@arbitrator.com.au Internet:http://www.arbitrator.com.au

User Tools

Site Tools


drafting

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

drafting [2017/07/30 18:00] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Drafting ======
 +  * The author of the excellent article, [[http://​www.adr.org/​si.asp?​id=2555|Drafting Arbitration Clauses - Avoiding the 7 Deadly Sins]], sets out those sins as:
 +
 +^Sins^Description (our wording)^  ​
 +|Equivocation|Failure to agree to arbitrate and instead reserving some rights for litigation thereby ensuring a dispute about what disputes are arbitral and what are not|
 +|Inattention|Failure to ensure that the arbitration is enforceable in the most likely state in which enforcement may be required|
 +|Omission|Failure to specify how the arbitrator is to be appointed or which rules of appointment (if any) are applicable to the dispute.|
 +|Over Specification|Too much detail on who and how to arbitrate((This can be a large problem as often one party may use such provisions to delay or obstruct the arbitral process.))|  ​
 +|Unrealistic Expectations|Time limits are often unreasonable ((This can be fixed in many cases at the preliminary conference when such timetables can be reset and or the assistance of the Court sought))|
 +|Litigation Envy|Litigation Rules are specified as being required to be followed ​ ((A common misconception is that the litigation rules are without value. ​ That is incorrect. ​ Many Court rules can be useful. ​ For instance, it is important to know what is in dispute. ​ That can be done using pleadings or otherwise but it must be done.))|
 +|Overreaching|This is where one party specifies all the rules which are to operate in the arbitration to its favour. ​ \\ In Australia, as elsewhere in the world, such a clause and the ensuing arbitration is unlikely to be enforceable as it would not satisfy the requirement of being "​fair"​|
 +
 +  * He also cites ten essential provisions as being:
 +
 +^Provision^Our View((based on Australia Law))^ ​
 +|the agreement to arbitrate ​ | Critical|
 +|what disputes will be arbitrated \\ (broad or narrow clause) ​ |Important, a broad approach is preferable - otherwise a dispute can ensue about the scope of the agreement to arbitrate. ​ | 
 +|the rules that will govern the arbitration| Less important, the rules can be resolved as you proceed with the arbitration (subject to having a good arbitrator). ​ | 
 +|the institution,​ if any, that will administer the arbitration ​ | Less important, it is only relevant in so far as it assists the parties to locate a good arbitrator. ​ | 
 +|the place of arbitration| Less important, we tend to find that far more important is the choice of the arbitrator. ​ \\ We determine disputes worldwide without difficulty using telecommunications. ​ \\ Please note that there is one important exception to this view.  That exception is that without agreement as to the applicable law the law of the place of the arbitration applies to determine the substantive rights between the parties. ​ | 
 +|in an international agreement, the language of the arbitration ​ |Less important, English is a common language and to be preferred unless this question is not relevant. ​ | 
 +|the applicable law ((if not provided elsewhere in the agreement)) ​ |Important, but can be determined using common law rules. |
 +|the procedural law that will apply to the arbitration ​ | Irrelevant, far more important is the choice of the arbitrator. ​ | 
 +|the number of arbitrators and how they will be chosen ​ | Irrelevant, unless there is a tactical advantage for the parties. \\ eg. in some rules for a three arbitrator panels the parties each nominate an arbitrator. ​ Those arbitrators then agree who is to be the third arbitrator. ​ | 
 +|an agreement that judgment may be entered on the award  | Not important in Australia unless it is said that the arbitration is not enforceable - in which case there is no agreement to arbitrate ​ |
 +
  

  © White SW Computer Law 1994-2016. ABN 94 669 684 644. All Rights Reserved.
  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
  This website is a guide only and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice.
  Readers should make their own enquiries and seek appropriate legal advice.
  For legal advice please email wcl@computerlaw.com.au