Melbourne Office - PO Box 452, COLLINS STREET WEST VIC 8007 AUSTRALIA
Sydney Office - GPO Box 2506, SYDNEY NSW 2001 AUSTRALIA
Telephone: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3709 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 2600
Facsimile: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3217 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 3044
Email:adr@arbitrator.com.au Internet:http://www.arbitrator.com.au

User Tools

Site Tools


can_an_arbitral_tribunal_determine_trade_practices_claims

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
can_an_arbitral_tribunal_determine_trade_practices_claims [2013/01/21 21:53]
steve
can_an_arbitral_tribunal_determine_trade_practices_claims [2017/07/30 18:00] (current)
Line 2: Line 2:
   * An arbitral tribunal can determine most Trade Practices claims.   * An arbitral tribunal can determine most Trade Practices claims.
   * The claims it can determine are typically those inter partes and those which, of course, are subject to the written arbitration agreement.   * The claims it can determine are typically those inter partes and those which, of course, are subject to the written arbitration agreement.
-====== Cases (for) ======+===== Cases (for) =====
   * [[Casaceli v Natuzzi|Casaceli v Natuzzi S.p.A.]](([2012] FCA 691))   * [[Casaceli v Natuzzi|Casaceli v Natuzzi S.p.A.]](([2012] FCA 691))
   * [[Stericorp v Stericycle|Stericorp Ltd v Stericycle Inc]](([2005] VSC 203))   * [[Stericorp v Stericycle|Stericorp Ltd v Stericycle Inc]](([2005] VSC 203))
Line 10: Line 10:
   * [[ET Plus v Welter & Ors|ET Plus SA & Ors v Welter & Ors]](([2005] EWHC 2115 (Comm) ))   * [[ET Plus v Welter & Ors|ET Plus SA & Ors v Welter & Ors]](([2005] EWHC 2115 (Comm) ))
   * [[Comandate Marine v Pan Australia Shipping|Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australia Shipping Ltd]](([2006] FCAFC 192))   * [[Comandate Marine v Pan Australia Shipping|Comandate Marine Corp v Pan Australia Shipping Ltd]](([2006] FCAFC 192))
-====== Cases (against) ​======+===== Cases (against) =====
   * [[Walter Rau Neusser Oel und Fett v Cross Pacific Trading|Walter Rau Neusser Oel und Fett AG v Cross Pacific Trading Ltd]](([2005] FCA 1102))   * [[Walter Rau Neusser Oel und Fett v Cross Pacific Trading|Walter Rau Neusser Oel und Fett AG v Cross Pacific Trading Ltd]](([2005] FCA 1102))
   * [[Clough Engineering v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation|Clough Engineering Limited v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation]](([2007] FCA 881))   * [[Clough Engineering v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation|Clough Engineering Limited v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation]](([2007] FCA 881))
  

  © White SW Computer Law 1994-2019. ABN 94 669 684 644. All Rights Reserved.
  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
  This website is a guide only and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice.
  Readers should make their own enquiries and seek appropriate legal advice.
  For legal advice please email wcl@computerlaw.com.au